A Comparison of Ballistic Resistance Testing Techniques in the Department of Defense

This paper summarizes sensitivity test methods commonly employed in the Department of Defense. A comparison study shows that modern methods such as Neyer’s method and Three-Phase Optimal Design are improvements over historical methods. Suggested Citation Johnson, Thomas H., Laura Freeman, Janice Hester, and Jonathan L. Bell. “A Comparison of Ballistic Resistance Testing Techniques in the Department of Defense.” IEEE Access 2 (2014): 1442–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2377633. Paper:

2014 · Thomas Johnson, Laura Freeman, Janice Hester, Jonathan Bell

Applying Risk Analysis to Acceptance Testing of Combat Helmets

Acceptance testing of combat helmets presents multiple challenges that require statistically-sound solutions. For example, how should first article and lot acceptance tests treat multiple threats and measures of performance? How should these tests account for multiple helmet sizes and environmental treatments? How closely should first article testing requirements match historical or characterization test data? What government and manufacturer risks are acceptable during lot acceptance testing? Similar challenges arise when testing other components of Personal Protective Equipment and similar statistical approaches should be applied to all components....

2014 · Janice Hester, Laura Freeman

Design of Experiments for in-Lab Operational Testing of the an/BQQ-10 Submarine Sonar System

Operational testing of the AN/BQQ-10 submarine sonar system has never been able to show significant improvements in software versions because of the high variability of at sea measurements. To mitigate this problem, in the most recent AN/BQQ-10 operational test, the Navy’s operational test agency (in consultation with IDA under the direction of Director, Operational Test and Evaluation) supplemented the at sea testing with an operationally focused in-lab comparison. This test used recorded real data played back on two different versions of the sonar system....

2014 · Laura Freeman, Justace Clutter, George Khoury

Power Analysis Tutorial for Experimental Design Software

This guide provides both a general explanation of power analysis and specific guidance to successfully interface with two software packages, JMP and Design Expert (DX). Suggested Citation Freeman, Laura J., Thomas H. Johnson, and James R. Simpson. “Power Analysis Tutorial for Experimental Design Software:” Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, November 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA619843. Paper:

2014 · James Simpson, Thomas Johnson, Laura Freeman

Taking the Next Step- Improving the Science of Test in DoD T&E

The current fiscal climate demands now, more than ever, that test and evaluation(T&E) provide relevant and credible characterization of system capabilities andshortfalls across all relevant operational conditions as efficiently as possible. Indetermining the answer to the question, “How much testing is enough?” it isimperative that we use a scientifically defensible methodology. Design ofExperiments (DOE) has a proven track record in Operational Test andEvaluation (OT&E) of not only quantifying how much testing is enough, but alsowhere in the operational space the test points should be placed....

2014 · Laura Freeman, V. Bram Lillard