Mixed Effects Models

We present a simulation study that examines the impact of small sample sizes in both observation and nesting levels of the model on the fixed effect bias, type I error, and the power of a simple mixed model analysis. Despite the need for adjustments to control for type I error inflation, our findings indicate that smaller samples than previously recognized can be used for mixed models under certain conditions prevalent in applied research....

Mixed-effects models are the standard technique for analyzing data with grouping structure. In defense testing, these models are useful because they allow us to account for correlations between observations, a feature common in many operational tests. In this article, we describe the advantages of modeling data from a mixed-effects perspective and discuss an R package—ciTools—that equips the user with easy methods for presenting results from this type of model. Suggested Citation Haman, John, Matthew Avery, and Heather Wojton....

Accurately presenting model estimates with appropriate uncertainties is critical to the credibility and defensibility of anypiece of statistical analysis. When dealing with complex data that require hierarchical covariance structures, many of the standardapproaches for visualizing uncertainty are insufficient. One such case is data fit with log-linear autoregressive mixed effectsmodels. Data requiring such an approach have three exceptional characteristics.1. The data are sampled in “groups” that exhibit variation unexplained by other model factors....