<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sarah Shaffer on Test Science Research Document Library</title>
    <link>https://research.testscience.org/researchers/sarah-shaffer/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Sarah Shaffer on Test Science Research Document Library</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.129.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Institute for Defense Analyses</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://research.testscience.org/researchers/sarah-shaffer/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of the SALIANT Procedure for Assessing Team Situation Awareness</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2024-meta-analysis-of-the-effectiveness-of-the-saliant-procedure-for-assessing-team-situation-awareness/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2024-meta-analysis-of-the-effectiveness-of-the-saliant-procedure-for-assessing-team-situation-awareness/</guid>
      <description>Many Department of Defense (DoD) systems aim to increase or maintain Situational Awareness (SA) at the individual or group level. In some cases, maintenance or enhancement of SA is listed as a primary function or requirement of the system. However, during test and evaluation SA is examined inconsistently or is not measured at all. Situational Awareness Linked Indicators Adapted to Novel Tasks (SALIANT) is an empirically-based methodology meant to measure SA at the team, or group, level.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[

    
    <div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
      <iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Vmt1CT__stU?autoplay=0&controls=1&end=0&loop=0&mute=0&start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"
      ></iframe>
    </div>

<p>Many Department of Defense (DoD) systems aim to increase or maintain Situational Awareness (SA) at the individual or group level. In some cases, maintenance or enhancement of SA is listed as a primary function or requirement of the system. However, during test and evaluation SA is examined inconsistently or is not measured at all. Situational Awareness Linked Indicators Adapted to Novel Tasks (SALIANT) is an empirically-based methodology meant to measure SA at the team, or group, level. While research using the SALIANT model suggests that it effectively quantifies team SA, no study has examined the effectiveness of SALIANT across the entirety of the existing empirical research.  The aim of the current work is to conduct a meta-analysis of previous research to examine the overall reliability of SALIANT as an SA measurement tool. This meta-analysis will assess when and how SALIANT can serve as a reliable indicator of performance at testing. Additional applications of SALIANT in non-traditional operational testing domains will also be discussed.</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Shaffer, Sarah, Miriam Armstrong, and Rebecca Medlin. Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of the SALIANT Procedure for Assessing Team Situation Awareness. IDA Product ID 3001867. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2024.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Operational T&amp;E of AI-Supported Data Integration, Fusion, and Analysis Systems</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2024-operational-t-e-of-ai-supported-data-integration-fusion-and-analysis-systems/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2024-operational-t-e-of-ai-supported-data-integration-fusion-and-analysis-systems/</guid>
      <description>AI will play an important role in future military systems. However, large questions remain about how to test AI systems, especially in operational settings. Here, we discuss an approach for the operational test and evaluation (OT&amp;amp;E) of AI-supported data integration, fusion, and analysis systems. We highlight new challenges posed by AI-supported systems and we discuss new and existing OT&amp;amp;E methods for overcoming them. We demonstrate how to apply these OT&amp;amp;E methods via a notional test concept that focuses on evaluating an AI-supported data integration system in terms of its technical performance (how accurate is the AI output?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[

    
    <div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
      <iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JqlIzJh-RQI?autoplay=0&controls=1&end=0&loop=0&mute=0&start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"
      ></iframe>
    </div>

<p>AI will play an important role in future military systems. However, large questions remain about how to test AI systems, especially in operational settings. Here, we discuss an approach for the operational test and evaluation (OT&amp;E) of AI-supported data integration, fusion, and analysis systems. We highlight new challenges posed by AI-supported systems and we discuss new and existing OT&amp;E methods for overcoming them. We demonstrate how to apply these OT&amp;E methods via a notional test concept that focuses on evaluating an AI-supported data integration system in terms of its technical performance (how accurate is the AI output?) and human systems interaction (how does the AI affect users?).</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Anderson, Breeana G, Adam M Miller, Logan K Ausman, John T Haman, Keyla Pagan-Rivera, Sarah A Shaffer, and Brian D Vickers. Data Integration, Fusion, and Analysis Systems. IDA Product ID 3001848. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2024.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
