<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Statistical Methods on Test Science Research Document Library</title>
    <link>https://research.testscience.org/keywords/statistical-methods/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Statistical Methods on Test Science Research Document Library</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.129.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Institute for Defense Analyses</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://research.testscience.org/keywords/statistical-methods/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A Practitioner’s Framework for Federated Model Validation Resource Allocation</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2024-a-practitioner-s-framework-for-federated-model-validation-resource-allocation/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2024-a-practitioner-s-framework-for-federated-model-validation-resource-allocation/</guid>
      <description>Recent advances in computation and statistics led to an increasing use of federated models for end-to-end system test and evaluation. A federated model is a collection of interconnected models where the outputs of a model act as inputs to subsequent models. However, the process of verifying and validating federated models is poorly understood, especially when testers have limited resources, knowledge-based uncertainties, and concerns over operational realism. Testers often struggle with determining how to best allocate limited test resources for model validation.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[

    
    <div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
      <iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/owcIxrA_sXs?autoplay=0&controls=1&end=0&loop=0&mute=0&start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"
      ></iframe>
    </div>

<p>Recent advances in computation and statistics led to an increasing use of federated models for end-to-end system test and evaluation. A federated model is a collection of interconnected models where the outputs of a model act as inputs to subsequent models. However, the process of verifying and validating federated models is poorly understood, especially when testers have limited resources, knowledge-based uncertainties, and concerns over operational realism. Testers often struggle with determining how to best allocate limited test resources for model validation. We propose a network-based representation of federated models, where the network encodes the connections between the federation of models. Nodes of the graph are given by sub-models. A directed edge from node a to node b is drawn if a inputs into b. We quantify their uncertainties through edge weights using meta-modeling and variance-based sensitivity analysis. The network-based framework allows us to propagate the uncertainties through the federated model and optimize resource allocation for validation based on the uncertainties.</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Capp, Jo Anna, John T Haman, and Dhruv Patel. A Practitioner’s Framework for Federated Model Validation Resource Allocation. IDA Product ID 3001838. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2024.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statistical Methods Development Work for M&amp;S Validation</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2023-statistical-methods-development-work-for-m-s-validation/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2023-statistical-methods-development-work-for-m-s-validation/</guid>
      <description>We discuss four areas in which statistically rigorous methods contribute to modeling and simulation validation studies. These areas are statistical risk analysis, space-filling experimental designs, metamodel construction, and statistical validation. Taken together, these areas implement DOT&amp;amp;E guidance on model validation. In each area, IDA has contributed either research methods, user-friendly tools, or both. We point to our tools on testscience.org, and survey the research methods that we&amp;rsquo;ve contributed to the M&amp;amp;S validation literature</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss four areas in which statistically rigorous methods contribute to modeling and simulation validation studies. These areas are statistical risk analysis, space-filling experimental designs, metamodel construction, and statistical validation. Taken together, these areas implement DOT&amp;E guidance on model validation. In each area, IDA has contributed either research methods, user-friendly tools, or both. We point to our tools on testscience.org, and survey the research methods that we&rsquo;ve contributed to the M&amp;S validation literature</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Miller, Curtis G. “Statistical Methods Development Work for M&amp;S Validation.” International Test and Evaluation Association 44, no. 3 (September 11, 2023). <a href="https://doi.org/10.61278/itea.44.3.1010">https://doi.org/10.61278/itea.44.3.1010</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

<h4 id="paper">Paper:</h4>
<embed src= "paper.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metamodeling Techniques for Verification and Validation of Modeling and Simulation Data</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2022-metamodeling-techniques-for-verification-and-validation-of-modeling-and-simulation-data/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2022-metamodeling-techniques-for-verification-and-validation-of-modeling-and-simulation-data/</guid>
      <description>Modeling and simulation (M&amp;amp;S) outputs help the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&amp;amp;E) assess the effectiveness, survivability, lethality, and suitability of systems. To use M&amp;amp;S outputs, DOT&amp;amp;E needs models and simulators to be sufficiently verified and validated. The purpose of this paper is to improve the state of verification and validation by recommending and demonstrating a set of statistical techniques—metamodels, also called statistical emulators—to the M&amp;amp;S community.
The paper expands on DOT&amp;amp;E’s existing guidance about metamodel usage by creating methodological recommendations the M&amp;amp;S community could apply to its activities.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[

    
    <div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
      <iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/s4DUCI1M8Fw?autoplay=0&controls=1&end=0&loop=0&mute=0&start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"
      ></iframe>
    </div>

<p>Modeling and simulation (M&amp;S) outputs help the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&amp;E) assess the effectiveness, survivability, lethality, and suitability of systems. To use M&amp;S outputs, DOT&amp;E needs models and simulators to be sufficiently verified and validated. The purpose of this paper is to improve the state of verification and validation by recommending and demonstrating a set of statistical techniques—metamodels, also called statistical emulators—to the M&amp;S community.</p>
<p>The paper expands on DOT&amp;E’s existing guidance about metamodel usage by creating methodological recommendations the M&amp;S community could apply to its activities. For a deterministic, discrete response variable, we recommend using a nearest neighbor or decision tree model. For a deterministic, continuous response variable, we recommend Gaussian process interpolation. For a stochastic response variable, we recommend a generalized additive model. We also present a set of techniques that testers can use to assess the adequacy of their metamodels. We conclude with a notional example that demonstrates the recommended techniques.</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Haman, John T, and Curtis G Miller. Metamodeling Techniques for Verification and Validation of Modeling and Simulation Data. IDA Paper P-33230. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2022.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

<h4 id="paper">Paper:</h4>
<embed src= "paper.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
