<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Gaussian Process Model on Test Science Research Document Library</title>
    <link>https://research.testscience.org/keywords/gaussian-process-model/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Gaussian Process Model on Test Science Research Document Library</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.129.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Institute for Defense Analyses</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://research.testscience.org/keywords/gaussian-process-model/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Metamodeling Techniques for Verification and Validation of Modeling and Simulation Data</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2022-metamodeling-techniques-for-verification-and-validation-of-modeling-and-simulation-data/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2022-metamodeling-techniques-for-verification-and-validation-of-modeling-and-simulation-data/</guid>
      <description>Modeling and simulation (M&amp;amp;S) outputs help the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&amp;amp;E) assess the effectiveness, survivability, lethality, and suitability of systems. To use M&amp;amp;S outputs, DOT&amp;amp;E needs models and simulators to be sufficiently verified and validated. The purpose of this paper is to improve the state of verification and validation by recommending and demonstrating a set of statistical techniques—metamodels, also called statistical emulators—to the M&amp;amp;S community.
The paper expands on DOT&amp;amp;E’s existing guidance about metamodel usage by creating methodological recommendations the M&amp;amp;S community could apply to its activities.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[

    
    <div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
      <iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/s4DUCI1M8Fw?autoplay=0&controls=1&end=0&loop=0&mute=0&start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"
      ></iframe>
    </div>

<p>Modeling and simulation (M&amp;S) outputs help the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&amp;E) assess the effectiveness, survivability, lethality, and suitability of systems. To use M&amp;S outputs, DOT&amp;E needs models and simulators to be sufficiently verified and validated. The purpose of this paper is to improve the state of verification and validation by recommending and demonstrating a set of statistical techniques—metamodels, also called statistical emulators—to the M&amp;S community.</p>
<p>The paper expands on DOT&amp;E’s existing guidance about metamodel usage by creating methodological recommendations the M&amp;S community could apply to its activities. For a deterministic, discrete response variable, we recommend using a nearest neighbor or decision tree model. For a deterministic, continuous response variable, we recommend Gaussian process interpolation. For a stochastic response variable, we recommend a generalized additive model. We also present a set of techniques that testers can use to assess the adequacy of their metamodels. We conclude with a notional example that demonstrates the recommended techniques.</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Haman, John T, and Curtis G Miller. Metamodeling Techniques for Verification and Validation of Modeling and Simulation Data. IDA Paper P-33230. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2022.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

<h4 id="paper">Paper:</h4>
<embed src= "paper.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Space-Filling Designs for Modeling &amp; Simulation</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2021-space-filling-designs-for-modeling-simulation/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2021-space-filling-designs-for-modeling-simulation/</guid>
      <description>This document presents arguments and methods for using space-filling designs (SFDs) to plan modeling and simulation (M&amp;amp;S) data collection.
Suggested Citation Avery, Kelly, John T Haman, Thomas Johnson, Curtis Miller, Dhruv Patel, and Han Yi. Test Design Challenges in Defense Testing. IDA Product ID 3002855. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2024.
Slides: Paper: </description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This document presents arguments and methods for using space-filling designs (SFDs) to plan modeling and simulation (M&amp;S) data collection.</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Avery, Kelly, John T Haman, Thomas Johnson, Curtis Miller, Dhruv Patel, and Han Yi. Test Design Challenges in Defense Testing. IDA Product ID 3002855. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2024.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="slides">Slides:</h4>
<embed src= "slides.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

<h4 id="paper">Paper:</h4>
<embed src= "paper.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comparing Computer Experiments for the Gaussian Process Model Using Integrated Prediction Variance</title>
      <link>https://research.testscience.org/post/2013-comparing-computer-experiments-for-the-gaussian-process-model-using-integrated-prediction-variance/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://research.testscience.org/post/2013-comparing-computer-experiments-for-the-gaussian-process-model-using-integrated-prediction-variance/</guid>
      <description>Space-Filling Designs are a common choice of experimental design strategy for computer experiments. This paper compares space filling design types based on their theoretical prediction variance properties with respect to the Gaussian Process model.
Suggested Citation Silvestrini, Rachel T., Douglas C. Montgomery, and Bradley Jones. “Comparing Computer Experiments for the Gaussian Process Model Using Integrated Prediction Variance.” Quality Engineering 25, no. 2 (April 2013): 164–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.758284.
Paper: </description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space-Filling Designs are a common choice of experimental design strategy for computer experiments. This paper compares space filling design types based on their theoretical prediction variance properties with respect to the Gaussian Process model.</p>
<h4 id="suggested-citation">Suggested Citation</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>Silvestrini, Rachel T., Douglas C. Montgomery, and Bradley Jones. “Comparing Computer Experiments for the Gaussian Process Model Using Integrated Prediction Variance.” Quality Engineering 25, no. 2 (April 2013): 164–74. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.758284">https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.758284</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 id="paper">Paper:</h4>
<embed src= "paper.pdf" width= "100%" height= "700px" type="application/pdf" >

]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
